Enacted fiscal documents
| Enacted document | What it establishes |
|---|---|
| ONCR 21-02 | FY2021 projected revenue $56,300,085; total budget outlay $50,974,526; $5,325,559 remaining |
| ONCR 21-13 | FY2021 revision; projected revenue $82,124,990, with the outlay figures unchanged |
| ONCR 22-05 | FY2023 projected revenue $67,407,750; Executive outlay $55,000,000 |
| ONCR 22-11 | FY2023 revision; projected revenue $71,561,000; Executive outlay $56,658,960 |
| ONCR 23-16 | FY2024 projected revenue; Executive outlay $60,000,000 |
| ONCR 24-19 | FY2025 projected revenue; Executive outlay $60,000,000 |
| ONCR 25-21 | FY2026 projected revenue $88,310,077; outlays $0 |
| ONCR 25-26 | FY2026 revision; projected revenue revised to $97,610,077; outlays $0 |
| ONCR 26-12 | FY2027 projected revenue $90,958,077; Executive outlay $60,000,000 |
| ONCA 24-73 | FY2025 Executive appropriation $64,667,765 |
| ONCA 25-96 | FY2026 Executive appropriation $75,913,722; Daposka $2,597,099 at Section 16 |
| ONCA 26-01 | FY2026 Executive supplemental $1,619,939 |
Acts that built and amended the outlay provision
15 ONC § 1A-104 is not original text. These are the acts that wrote it, and the one that removed most of it.
| Enacted document | What it did |
|---|---|
| ONCA 13-67 | Amended 15 ONC § 1A-104, effective October 21, 2013 |
| ONCA 18-57 | The predecessor bill, enrolled April 11, 2019 and vetoed on April 16. The Executive veto message returns it with four numbered objections and invites a revised bill; ONCA 19-40 was the answer to it. Not enacted |
| ONCA 19-40 | Created the Revenue Advisory Commission at 15 ONC § 1A-103, effective April 26, 2019 |
| ONCA 19-57 | Titled the section “Projected revenue and budget outlay requirements” and gave subsection D its two numbered parts. Effective June 28, 2019 |
| ONCA 20-40 | Repealed the Commission, struck both numbered parts of subsection D and the ninety-eight percent appropriation ceiling, and retitled the section. Effective April 27, 2020 |
Other legislation this record cites
15 ONC § 1-103 requires legislation for a special session to be filed with the Clerk at least 3 business days before the session, and the record quotes the section in full. August 3, 2026, the stamp date on ONCA 26-36 and ONCA 26-37, is three business days before the special session of August 6, 2026. The record does not describe what the other acts listed here provide.
| Enacted document | What it is |
|---|---|
| ONCA 23-39 | “An Act to create a budget impoundment process; and to establish an alternate effective date”, read on March 31, 2023 |
| ONCA 23-64 | Second impoundment bill under the same title, read on April 21, 2023 |
| ONCA 25-101 | Authorized the Office of the Principal Chief to expend additional monies appropriated through the FY2026 appropriation bills |
| ONCA 26-36 | Carries the Clerk’s August 3, 2026 stamp |
| ONCA 26-37 | Carries the Clerk’s August 3, 2026 stamp. Amends ONCA 25-101 and authorizes $394,965 to the IDC-Office of the Principal Chief for FY2026 |
| ONCA 26-38 | Filed August 4, 2026, the day Executive Order 26-01 was signed |
| ONCA 26-40 | Filed August 4, 2026, first of ONCA 26-40 through 26-47 |
| ONCA 26-47 | Filed August 4, 2026, last of ONCA 26-40 through 26-47 |
Supreme Court opinions this record cites
| Opinion | What it decided |
|---|---|
| SPC-2013-01 | Red Corn v. Red Eagle, May 10, 2013. The Speaker's declaratory action over an enterprise board appointment; relief denied |
| SPC-2013-03 | Red Eagle v. ON Congress, January 2, 2014. The Chief's challenge to removal proceedings; process upheld, parts of Rule 12 invalidated |
| SCO-2015-01 | Standing Bear v. Whitehorn, slip opinion March 8, 2016. Struck salary freezes and Treasurer directives in the FY2016 appropriation acts; held that appropriations are amended only by a further act of Congress |
| SCO-2016-01 | Standing Bear v. Pratt, slip opinion August 11, 2017. Struck provisions of the Budget Parameter and Limitation Act, ONCA 13-67, and of re-enacted FY2017 salary freezes; read the March 2017 amendment as awaiting implementing legislation |
| SCO-2020-01 | Edwards v. Osage Nation Supreme Court et al., May 2020. Dismissed: a petition by an individual Congress member is not a dispute between the branches |
The Judicial Branch page links both slip opinions through file-sharing addresses that no longer resolve, so the links above go to Internet Archive captures of the same files.
Method notes
- Quotations are verbatim, from a recording or an enacted document, at a stated date.
- Figures come from the enacted version of each resolution or act. The one exception is ONCR 25-01, one of the ten FY2021 to FY2027 projected revenue resolutions in the series reviewed on the record. Its figures on the record were originally read from the engrossed version because the enacted link returned an error; that link now resolves, and the enacted text matches the engrossed figures exactly at ONCR 25-01, enacted.
- No FY2022 projected-revenue resolution appears in the enacted fiscal documents table. The record names no enacted projected-revenue resolution for FY2022.
- The Nation's audio file for the September 24, 2024 Appropriations meeting carries 2023 in its filename. The meeting is the 2024 one.
- Every quotation can be checked against the recording or enacted document it comes from.
Corrections and additions
If something here is wrong, or you hold a document that answers one of the open questions, please send it to corrections@sixtymillion.org. Corrections are published on this record with the date they were made. For anything else, write to contact@sixtymillion.org.
Documents are more useful than descriptions of them. A page number, a resolution number, or a date is enough to work from.